Color defense
A good defense may be bad. I am well known because I find that most men and women think it is a good thing, so the defense is good. For these people who are not good, I don’t know if Louis Golding has made this strange mistake, but I know that his intentions are good and his reasons are useless.
Louis Golding tried to criticize anti-Semitism. Theoretically speaking, it was an easy task. It was enough to refute anti-Semitism without breaking sophistry. But Golding felt that it was not enough. After refuting those sophistry, he gave them back to his opponents. These people absurdly refused to recognize the contribution of Jewish culture to German culture, and Golding also absurdly denied the contribution of German culture to Jewish culture. He declared that racism was nonsense, but he pointed his finger at Maimang’s Jewish racism. After opposing Nazi racism, he would always. It is not the same as the German shortcoming to say that the defense turns to counterattack because of the advantages of Jews, and it is improper because it is equivalent to accepting the enemy’s point of view in some way and separating Jews from non-Jews.
At the beginning of this volume, I promised to briefly consider the Jewish issue from all angles. In fact, Bayloc had made a profound deliberation in the Jews’ London in 1937. Instead of making any deliberation, Golding retaliated with incurable fanaticism and made a list of martyrs. He sometimes ridiculed, sometimes angered and sometimes sympathized, telling the long history of the Nistelians. It was a heroic escape history full of blood and tears. More than 200 pages and the last 40 pages praised Arthur Belfo’s failure to believe in the success of Zionism in South America in Syria, because those countries often suffered from malaria, and the government was unstable.
This defense is also accompanied by ancient images of the stake Henry Bergson, israel, Zangwill Sigmund Freud, Albert Einstein, Paul ehrlich, Paul Mooney and other photos.
Translated by Xu Shaojun and Wang Xiaofang
1 refers to the Jewish problem.
PaulEhrlih18541915 German bacteriologist won the Nobel Prize for Health or Medicine in 1998.
3PaulMuni18951967 American drama and film performance artist was born in a Jewish family in Poland.
Arnold Whitehead’s mode of thinking
Without Whitehead’s understanding of contemporary philosophy, almost no one can understand Whitehead’s theory, which is inconsistent before and after, and will prove his point of view when he is most firmly opposed. However, his theory has been widely spread, which has damaged his reputation. Every chapter is easy to understand when Whitehead writes every sentence. The difficulty is to organize the partial solution into a harmonious body. People definitely told me that this body is when I know that he may understand Plato’s cosmological model, which is very important. When Whitehead said that its eternal things gradually entered, their combination continued to develop, which determined the reality.
The way of thinking is obscure, not vague, just like Whitehead’s. Many paragraphs in this passage are very profound than Whitehead’s writing at the end. Philosophers are persistent in their assumptions, which will make their thoughts barren. We should be sure that we should be very sure that human beings have ideas that can be experienced by them, so people recognize that these ideas can be expressed in a single word or sentence of human language. I call this attitude perfect and dictionary-lacking lies.
Who would have thought that chesterton had refuted this view with passion? I copied a passage he wrote on page 17 of the wall published in 1994. People know that it is more chaotic and countless to change their names in their minds than in the autumn forest, but they believe that all the collocation changes of these colors can be accurately expressed by different sounds. They believe that a securities economy can indeed send all the strong desires that represent all the secrets of memory.
Whitehead said that the way of thinking is a supplement to my previous life. I think that the truth of philosophy should be based on the argument of memorizing the family rather than being detailed, so both philosophy and poetry should express the final meaning of the text.
This part consists of four parts: the impulsive activities of creation are natural boundaries, and life forms and goals.
Translated by Xu Shaojun and Wang Xiaofang
Jules Roman Verdun 1
On February 25th, 1916, a Prussian infantry patrol lost its way in the Battle of Verdun. They found a half-bombed building and a suspension bridge in the basement of the building. They found that 23 blue soldiers were exhausted and fell asleep. The Prussian lieutenant woke them up and told them that they had been captured. They told the lieutenant in amazement that they had just occupied Fort Duomenburg. A few hours later, a German official document claimed that despite the stubborn resistance of the guards in Duomenburg, the Brandenburg Army commanded in Kaiser and occupied the fort through hand-to-hand combat. Although the general was a soldier, he signed this document.
Jules Roman’s war novels don’t describe historical events. Verdun’s prelude, Verdun should first emphasize the influence of unexpected events in the war, the invisibility of the war’s subjectivity. b. h. liddell hart fabricated the incident, and Jules Roman wrote it as a novel. Roman said that the officers blinked nervously and bit their lips, and they were sure they were not dreaming. They found that they had never expected that the carefully planned events would be poor and novel. A war was waged by tens of millions of people, and the physical characteristics of these tens of millions of people were different in the same strategy.
War or anti-war literature has been used to observing the material side of war without considering other aspects. Homer’s description of heroic scars is as accurate as that of surgeons. Kipling tells the story of soldiers who encounter trivial things. Babiser is not stingy with blood and soil. Jules Roman may be the first novelist who covers the theme of the Ministry of War, that is, material, mental and intellectual. His novels record the battle of Verdun, which destroyed French hills in more than 200 nights.
The plot of Henry Barbiser Fritz von Onlu’s novels is more tense than Roman’s, but he is quick-witted and covers a wide range.
Translated by Xu Shaojun and Wang Xiaofang
This article was first published in Family Magazine on April 7th, 1939.
Two detective novels
I have always believed that the genre of writing is fatal. One of them is fable, which always ends in being able to tell a certain moral concept by a bird. I am surprised, indignant and at a loss. The other one can rarely say that my style is a long detective novel. I feel uncomfortable that detective novels are all a simple question that can be dictated in five minutes. The novelist has to write it into a 300-page story because of business needs. In this case, detective novels have become long stories. In other cases, detective novels are variations of romance or custom novels.
Fatal health is the center of John Rhodes and John Dixon Carr’s co-writing, which means that a man was killed in the ladder and the ladder door was not hit until the ladder stopped. This plot seems to be repeating the pleasant story in Lerufa’s secret of reading the yellow room. It is the mechanical ending of the last two chapters of the novel. This ending is even worse because of an illustration. After the illustration was shot by Rhodes and John Dixon Carr’s pistol, it fell to the ground and shattered.
Austin Freeman 1 writing a stone monkey is much better. It is true that reading this kind of novel will immediately guess the plot of the novel, just like reading ellery Quinn’s best novel. It is not that I don’t know that the mysterious plot is not mysterious. When it comes to the end, I do something simple as if he knows that we all know the knot. Knowing that he is at a loss to read can make him feel happy, so that reading can track and see the development of the knot event.
Translated by Xu Shaojun and Wang Xiaofang
1AusinFreean1861943 British home
Yuwen life
London wrote a Tibetan novel in English in China. The Five Wise Lamas’ Companionship is a novel by Yundan Gyatso Lama. The first purpose is to praise the western religious misunderstanding of Tibetan life in China, which obviously weakens the authenticity. The novel describes a pure love. Its tragic ending is too mediocre, but it has been sublimated by a remarkable feature, which is to calmly describe the magical story. There are many realistic details in the story.
Translated by Xu Shaojun and Wang Xiaofang
William Somerset Mao Mu Christmas Holiday 1
Charley Mei Sen is a typical British youth. People will think that he is a figure created by French or Hollywood. He went to Paris for a while. Zhou Mu was a fun-seeking childhood friend. Simonimo led him to a suitable place and introduced him to a Russian girl whose husband committed heinous murder. She told her in detail about the crime in a week and showed that her life was aimed at redeeming her husband. Lydia, this is her name. She doesn’t believe in the emperor, but she believes in forgiveness of sin. She believes that she can atone for it through physical depravity. When she returned to England, Charley listened with amazement to confession, and he left a body. He tasted
It’s obviously poking fun at Charlie. Unfortunately, it’s also poking fun at Lydia as it is with naive Charlie.
According to this endless summary or memorization, the novel is not admirable, but it does not feel this way when reading. This book gives full play to the imagination and combination ability of Mao Mu’s ingenious description of the scene language
Like many other books, this important person Robert Berg, Leontina Berg, Madame Simone mault Di Jordan and others are more real than the main characters. We really hope that Mao Mu will write some novels with them.
The first few chapters of the novel are careless and clumsy. Maybe it is impatience or confidence that once we go deep into it, our interest will increase greatly.
Translated by Xu Shaojun and Wang Xiaofang
This article was first published in Family Magazine on April 1st, 1939.
Two political poets
Through the analysis of Campbell’s 1-flower rifle’s seven burdens on Bacher, we can find that neither Nazism nor Communism have found them. Walt Whitman’s second case is more obvious than the first one. It is surprising that dialectical materialism’s simple expression of history is that law produces poetry, on the contrary, Nazi’s emotional impulses lack logic, and it does not produce poets.
Roy Campbell made unremitting efforts to become a poet. Before he believed in Rosemburg Hauser’s theory, he was Rambo’s good brother. After two years of fighting in Navarra Castilla, his enthusiasm has not diminished, but his language ability has dropped a lot. The rifle is purely abusing the international column, the Red Army soldiers, the left-wing knowledge, and the Jews. This abuse is said to be creating rather than hating some ironic poems. People think of Byron, but more often, his poems remind people of Goebbels, which also praise the bullfighting general Franco’s poems.
Johannes Bacher, a communist poet, was also in vain. Around 1916, he was one of the top poets in Europe, especially in terms of gorgeous language. At that time, Bacher wrote some war poems to expose war crimes. It seemed that William II ruled Germany more broadly than other warring States, perhaps more casually, and he was allowed to tolerate him outside the literary circle. Now that Bacher has been put in Moscow, he can write something that pleases Stalin.
He has more than 200 pages, among which the value is that he misses Germany. After Byakki Smoker wrote a sonnet about the night, he described a man who was trapped in a maze made of mirrors on the ceiling and floor.
Translated by Xu Shaojun and Wang Xiaofang
1RyCapbell1911975 south African poet
This article was first published in Family Magazine on March 4th, 1939.
by
Tags: